“Hey, lay off! Leave me be! Don’t come one step nearer! I’m warning you!”
Thirteen masked, male Carleton students surround the middle-aged night watchman menacingly, determined to put the fear of God in him. They are sick of his poking his high-powered flashlight into their faces and the faces of their dates on blanket parties. They are going to truss him up and toss him into Lyman Memorial Lake.
But Roy Brees is a special police officer and authorized to carry a gun.
The thirteen students move in.
Brees pulls out his revolver and fires a shot.
Burt Krayenbuhl, the leader of the students, is hit.
Rushed to the Northfield, Minnesota hospital, he dies from his wound a few days later. That fateful shot rings out on May 27, 1935.
Poor Burt Krayenbuhl. Poor Roy Brees. Poor Carleton. A student prank results in a double tragedy. The students mean no physical harm to Roy, but they want to end his habit of invading their private space on warm spring evenings in May when they are enjoying the loving arms and soft lips of their dates.
The coroner’s jury exonerates Roy who believes the students mean to truss him up and toss him into this beautiful lake. Roy can’t swim a stroke. He is terrified. He is convinced his life is in danger. He acts impulsively without intending to cause physical harm to Burt. Just a warning shot to say, “I’m serious. Don’t push me.”
After this trauma, Roy Brees is not the same man. He is haunted by remorse. The college removes him from his watchman duties and assigns him to work in the college shop, but he is a social pariah on campus. Persona non grata . Ostracized. Lonely. Why, oh why didn’t he fire that warning shot into the air? I conjecture.
In April 1936, almost a year later, Roy completes the task of painting the boiler room ceiling in the college’s heating plant. As he lowers the scaffold he suddenly slips and plunges to his death on the concrete floor thirty feet below.
In his depressed and fatigued state, was Roy careless and physically out of control? Or, was he so despondent over killing a student that he let himself slip and fall to a certain death?
We shall never know.
But, since its founding in 1866, Carleton College has never experienced a more tragic episode. Should we bury this story in dusty archives or keep it alive to make sure there is no recurrence?
In 2006, does Carleton employ a night watchman armed with a revolver that might be fired and kill again? What is Carleton’s policy on arming its security force? Did Roy Brees need a gun to serve and protect the college community in a small, peaceful Midwest town?
Carleton’s Archivist, Eric Hillemann, responds to my inquiry: “To answer your other question, Carleton today employs a number of campus security officers, but they are not armed. I am not certain, but I think it probable that security personnel on the Carleton campus have never been armed since the 1935 tragedy.”
Ironically, in searching the archives, Hillemann learned from Burt Krayenbuhl’s file that the occupation of his father, Harvey E. Krayenbuhl, was also night watchman.
The photo is the Upper Lyman Lake with Margaret Evans Hall in the background. This girl’s dormitory housed my wife, then Jean Ann Murray, in her senior year.
After living in this gated retirement community for more than twenty-five years, I cannot understand why we have about a dozen Security Department sergeants armed with 9-millimeter pistols. As far as anyone knows, none of these guns has ever had to be removed from its holster. PCM’s risk analyst Jodi Martin tells me our liability insurance premium is not affected by having armed security officers, but I do not feel secure knowing they are armed.
Recently, the California Legislature passed an amendment to the Davis-Stirling Act that governs housing associations and prohibits police-type security operations. The sergeants have lost their Glock handguns. I feel more comfortable now.
